7. Complex many-electron atoms
Scientist that have contributed to the understanding of the structure of complex
many electron-atoms are:
The structure of complex atoms is in principle treated in the same way as that
of the hydrogen atom or the hydrogenlike atoms.
It boils down to solving the Schrödinger equation. There are
however two problems that complicate the picture:
All constituting particles have their three degrees of freedom complicating
immensely the solution of the Schrödinger equation:
exact solutions cannot be found.
A fundamental theorem of quantum mechanics related to the indistinguishability
of particles (here the electrons) comes into play: this gives restrictions on the
wave functions.
Approximate treatments of the Schrödinger equation
The underlying physical problem of the complex atom is that the electrons, distibuted in the
atom, undergo electrostatic repulsion. All electrons are attracted to the nucleus
by a central Coulomb force by a charge +Ze, similar as in the hydrogen atom.
The repulsive force between the electrons, represented by a potential
Vee involves the spatial coordinates of all electrons and is
not centrally directed.
In a simplified picture the binding energy can be calculated for the helium atom,
involving two electrons. The binding of two electrons in the central field of a +2e
nucleus adds to eight equivalents of Rydberg energies. If the two electrons
are assumed to stay at an average distance of 2 Bohr radii the repulsive
energy is 2 Rydberg equivalents. This simple model
(read)
gives almost the correct binding energy of -79 eV for the helium atom.
Of course no two-electron wave functions can be derived in this way.
For the helium atom variational calculations
(
see the variational priniple)
can be
performed that predict the binding energies of the quantum levels
up to 10 digits or more.
The effects of the non-central potential Vee is treated in the
Central Field Approximation model.
Also a
formal treatment can be given.
Here the Z(Z-1)/2 repulsive electrostatic contributions in Vee are
replaced by a single effective central potential V(r). In this model the attractive
potential (with +Ze) due to the nucleus and the repulsive potential (due to the
sum of the electrons) is taken as one Coulomb potential that scales as Zeff.
So each electron sees a screened charge Zeff, which is:
- at large distance Zeff = 1
- at short distance, near the nucleus Zeff = Z
Note that as a consequence electrons in orbitals with differing l quantum numbers
undergo different screening:
- they come closer to the nucleus (low l numbers)
- or they stay away (high l numbers)
The screened charge distribution Zeff can be written as a radially dependent
function Zeff(r). So the potential is no longer purely Coulombic !
This is the reason why
electron energies depend on the orbital angular momentum.
Slater developed a method to derive screening constants and calculate the binding
energies of electrons in various quantum states within the atom.
Slater's rules
These rules can also be applied to calculate
Atomic radii.
Hartree and Fock developed the self-consistent field method to numerically calculate
wave functions and energies in multi-electron systems. Particulerly sice the
availability of powerful computers ab initio calculations
of atomic (and molecular) structure has become feasible.
Self-consistent field method
The aufbau principle for the Periodic system
The electronic structure of many-electron systems is based on the following ingredients:
A calculation of the electronic orbitals in the central field model; note that the
level energies do depend on the quantum number l as discussed.
Filling of these one-electron orbitals with the number of electrons in the atom,
taking into account
Pauli's exclusion principle
that no two electrons can occupy the same state.
Shells are defined for each principal quantum number n with a degeneracy
factor 2n2.
For filled shells L = S = 0.
(read proof)
Hence only the electrons outside filled shells will contribute to
the angular momentum of the atom.
This shell-filling procedure is called the
Aufbau principle.
Note that this procedure holds for the electronic
ground states of the atoms.
Note that 2, 10, 18, 36 and 54 are the magic numbers associated with filled shells.
It is not always clear what the lowest orbital is, particlarly when filling 3d and 4s orbitals
that are almost energetic, depending on the specific Z number.
There is some irregularity, because of this, for chromium.
In this way the elements can be ordered according to their shells in the
Periodic Table of the Elements.
See also the
Web-elements version.
The elements in column have the same number of electrons in the outer shell and
also have the same angular momentum in the ground state configuration.
The elements in the rightmost column, the noble gases, have filled shells.
Based on this model the
ionization energies of the various atoms can be understood as well.
(read).
Another consequence of the Pauli principle for electrons
The Pauli exclusion principle was used already as the ordering principle for the
construction of the Peirodic table. The concept of indistinguishability has however
some deeper consequences for atomic structure.
Study Electron Asymmetry (Brehm and Mullin 9-5) and the consequences for the helium atom
(Brehm and Mullin 9-6).
The alkali atoms
Various couplings, Term values and Hund's rules
Last change: 21 February 2001